
There
is a nationally-syndicated columnist who regularly gives
advice to parents on managing their children. Many parents
appreciate his no-nonsense approach. He observes that
many parents in our society fail to enforce reasonable
limits with their children. For many, this failure to
act results from a fear of losing their children’s goodwill
if they take strong action.
This
failure to put limits on bad behavior has serious consequences
for our society. The columnist and I agree on that point.
Parents must let their children know that they are serious
about the rules they make. The way children know we are
serious is by that we enforce reasonable rules.
Yet
there is a danger in focusing first on consequences. “The
letter killeth but the spirit giveth life” (2 Cor. 3:6).
A Case Study
To
move this from an abstract, academic discussion to a practical
one, I will provide an example from the columnist’s published
column and contrast his approach to one that would probably
be more acceptable to scholars who study children and,
in my view, to true believers in Christ as well.
A
mother wrote to the columnist that their 4-year-old daughter
at some point during a meal would sometimes decide that
she couldn’t swallow her food. When told that she cannot
spit it out, she would hold the bite for hours. The mother
reported that they had tried many things to get the daughter
to swallow: having her remain at the table for hours,
skipping the next meal, returning the unswallowed food
to her at the next meal, removing toys and privileges
for weeks, banishment to her room without toys, spanking,
praising on those rare occasions when she swallowed, and
withholding dessert.
Almost
parenthetically, the mother noted that the girl was adopted
internationally a year previous. The problem began about
four months after the adoption. The mother also mentions
“other children” in the family.
Based
on this information, what do you think should be done
to solve the problem? Maybe even more interesting is the
question, what do you think Jesus would do to solve the
problem?
One Recommendation
Let’s
begin with the columnist’s recommendations. He first suggested
that it was not useful to look for a psychological cause
for the behavior. “This is one of those weird, strange,
inexplicable things that some children sometimes do, for
no obvious reason at all.” Further, “some of the things
children do defy explanation. Some of the odd stuff in
question is harmless to the point of being funny. What
your daughter is doing is funny (to me, at least), but
it’s also a very clever, subtle form of defiance.”
I
wonder if all of this is funny to the child who doesn’t
swallow. I doubt it.
The
columnist offers “a creative solution” very confidently
– offering to chew his hat if it doesn’t work: “You simply
tell your slyly defiant and highly intelligent little
princess that you called her doctor and he/she said that
not swallowing happens because a child is tired and doesn’t
even know it ... Your doctor said that from now on, if
you take a bite and you are so tired that you can’t swallow,
you have to go to the bathroom, spit it out and go to
bed. If she balks at swallowing, and you begin the procedure,
and she suddenly decides to swallow, you must still put
her to bed. Just tell her the doctor said that even having
problems swallowing means she’s tired and doesn’t know
it. I predict that in a week or two, it will be a thing
of the past, and I will still have my hat.”
Testing the Counsel
Does
this counsel sound good to you? If you were the child,
would it seem helpful to you? Is it likely that Jesus
would act this way?
Certainly
there are many responses to these questions. I don’t believe
there is only one “right” answer. But if I were responding
to the parent’s question, my recommendations would be
quite different from those of the quoted columnist.
A Different Starting Place
I
first recommend the kind of compassion and humility that
comes from understanding the child’s experience. What
were the first three years of the child’s life like? How
was she nurtured and nourished in those years? Did she
have consistent and caring attention during those three
years before she was adopted? Under what circumstances
was she adopted? How has this little girl integrated with
the other children in the adoptive family? Does she have
friends? What is the child’s personality or temperament
like? Is there a certain food that she refuses to chew?
Are there foods she enjoys? What kind of food did she
have before the international adoption? Was there unusual
stress in her life at the time the problem behavior began?
How have siblings reacted to the non-swallowing? Has this
girl been teased previously about her eating? How affectionate
and appreciative do the parents feel about this child
when not at the dinner table? Does the little girl have
friends and activities she enjoys?
To
confidently recommend a certain remedy without knowing
the child’s history seems like serious malpractice to
me. While some sensible actions can be suggested based
on the scant information provided by the parent, humility
is a wiser stance than dogmatism.
The Limits of Power
Apart
from the failure-to-get-vital-information issue, there
is another issue. Any parent advisor who has read research
knows that the “put-the-child-to-bed” prescription is
a power technique that guarantees a lifelong contract
with conflict. The power technique may have a smile on
its face but it is unmistakably a power play. No child
will be fooled no matter how big the smile. The burden
of research on guiding children recommends against the
strategy suggested by the columnist.
The
behavior recommended by the columnist may work in some
narrow sense. It is likely that the child will start swallowing
the food rather than be put to bed. Yet the real sickness
will go untreated. Does this child feel desperately confused
in her new country? Does she feel stupid and helpless
(maybe even picked on) in a family that already knows
the rules of American life? Does she feel lonely and unloved?
The Magic Cure
The
most clear finding of decades of research on parenting
is that the most important factor in determining a child’s
outcome is love. Children who have people who understand,
support, love, and teach them, are likely to become strong
and able adults. By turning up the power on the annoying
but harmless behavior, the columnist guarantees continuing
trouble. Worse yet, the prescriptions almost guarantee
that the root problems will get worse. Today’s dinner
battles may become tomorrow’s eating disorder, anxiety
problem, learned helplessness, or depression.
Based
on the scant information provided by the parent, I would
recommend minimizing the swallowing issue by unceremoniously
providing a “discharge” bowl for the little girl while
encouraging family members not to worry about the swallowing
issue. She is welcome to eat as much as she is inclined
to eat and may stop at any time. At the same time I would
look for ways to strengthen the parent-child relationship
away from the dinner table. The Number 1 question for
her parents (and all parent advisors) is “What is life
like for this 4-year-old?” I would recommend that the
parents monitor the child’s food preferences while noticing
the child’s areas of connection, expression, and joy as
well as any particular difficulties.
The
child is trying to tell us something. We will get the
message only if we have the patience and wisdom to hear
and interpret her message. As a side note, the best writing
on the subject of families and eating is probably Ellyn
Satter, who underscores that we should not turn eating
into a battleground. Many of us are still struggling with
irrational eating because of ill-advised eating rules
in our childhood homes.
Two Ways
The
columnist’s recommendations have a certain natural appeal.
I wonder if that is because the natural man in each of
us wants to be obeyed. The natural man does not even want
to be inconvenienced. “Things should be done my way –
and done promptly.”
In
contrast to the natural man is the “man of Christ” (Helaman
3:29). Just as Jesus consistently responded to injury
with compassion (see the parable of the Good Samaritan,
for example), so I feel sure that Jesus would minister
to a little, adopted girl’s loneliness in her unfamiliar
world. He might take her in His lap and hum to her. He
might ask her what foods from her native country were
her favorites. I can imagine him making a bear out of
peanut butter balls for her – if He knew that she liked
peanut butter.
Clearly
there are children’s misdeeds that need “consequences”
and teaching. But if we lead with correction rather than
compassion in our responses to children, we are not friends
to children and we are not His disciples. “By this shall
all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love
one to another” (John 13:35). Overriding love is what
distinguishes His followers from all others.
In
some ways we are much like God in our relationships with
children. We have far more power than they. We rule over
them. The question for all of us who are parents is whether
we will choose to act like God, whose name is love, or
like Satan, whose motto is compulsion. Will we lead with
heavenly charity or devilish control? Will we be saviors
or tormentors?
“But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which
believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone
were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in
the depth of the sea” (Matthew 18:6).
It is the natural man who turns a call for help into
an opportunity to punish. The man of Christ will respond
with healing compassion and patient ministration.
Of course there is more than love to effective parenting.
The next Myth of the Month will talk about heavenly ways
of setting limits.