| 
A Wrap-up
of the Case against CO&I
By Richard Eyre
Publisher's
note: Perhaps the three most pursued and coveted things in our modern
world are control, ownership, and independence. In Richard Eyre's
mind, they are the three deceivers — and are ultimately both unobtainable
and undesirable. They are, Eyre believes, the "false gods"
that separate us from Heavenly Father and rob us of the things of
the spirit. This column, exploring the obsessions we have developed
with “CO&I” — and later outlining a better and more spiritual
alternative for each — will open you to a new world of thinking
that may change how you live. Richard welcomes your feedback
and inputs. Take a guess at what you think the Three Alternatives
are. Write to him at Richard@meridianmagazine.com
. If you missed any of the four earlier columns in this series,
you can go to the Deceivers Archive (see right sidebar) and catch
up.
The Transition (over the next three weeks) from The Three Deceivers
to The Three Alternatives
Some of you (I know from your
letters) are getting a little anxious for the Three Alternatives
that I have promised — alternatives to the Three Deceivers.
Others of you are getting a little tired of me trying, week after
week, to totally convince you that Control, Ownership, and Independence
are deceivers and can do you harm (this group is not going to buy
it until you see the alternatives and become convinced that they
are better).
Still others (most of you actually,
based on the numbers of feedback emails I have received) are with
me on the deception of CO&I and are simply ready for the Three
Alternatives.
So, many readers will be happy to know
that D-day (publication day, unveiling day, revealing day) for the
Three Alternatives is coming very soon — on May 4 to be exact.
This current column is the last one that will be spent dissing CO&I,
and I will try to make the strongest arguments yet on their dangers
and deceptions before I will rest my case. Then the columns on April
20 and April 27 will be transition columns, creating the framework
for shifting our attitudes and our perspectives from the Three Deceivers
to the Three Alternatives. (These columns will use many of the ideas
and suggestions you have sent in concerning what would replace the
three deceivers.)
And then on May 4 we will present the
Alternatives, introduce them, and begin to explain how and why they
can change how we think about and how we live almost every aspect
of our lives. After May 4, this column will be called "The
Three Alternatives" and will explore, one by one, what each
Alternative is and how it works (within the Gospel) as a paradigm
for seeing and appreciating and making sense of the world.
Good Economics, Bad Life
As stated in an earlier column, Ownership
is the basic and foundational principle of a free enterprise economic
system, and is the motivation that makes it work. Control and Independence
are involved and related. In fact, a good definition of economics,
as far as I am concerned, is the study of money (ownership) and
its manipulation (control and independence). We live in a world
that is obsessed with these things, and viewed, by most people,
through an economic lens.
Control fits well and factors into
both the macro and micro economic model. The Fed controls interest
rates, Government tries to control fiscal and monetary policy, Individuals
try to control spending and cash flow. Control is a good economic
objective.
Independence is often the goal within
the economic model. "Financial independence" is a term
we throw around a lot and all think we want, even though none of
us can quite define exactly what it might entail — some combination
of unlimited resources and limited needs, I suppose, instead of
the opposite (which is what we all seem to have).
So CO&I are very useful and perhaps
very desirable economic concepts, though even when confined to economic
definitions they create win-lose competition, envy, jealousy, and
pride. The real problem with them comes when they "run over
the economic banks" (excuse the pun) and spill into our standard
for the bigger picture, and even for our spiritual perspective.
If we think we own our house and our car, it’s too easy to
think we own our kids, or our callings, or our opportunities —
or the many other things that can be owned only by God.
Why CO&I is the
Perfect Formula for Unhappiness in Today's World
Unhappiness could be defined as working
hard for something, only to discover that it can never be completely
achieved and that even the part we do achieve is empty and hollow.
The stories are so old that they are almost clichés. Envision
someone working so hard to possess something, thinking that it will
bring him happiness, only to find that he has traded his real chance
at happiness for it — or desperately seeking independence,
only to find loneliness and isolation — or trying to control
things that can't be controlled and being driven nuts by it.
At the heart of the deception is the
false claim that CO&I are the conditions that bring happiness.
Actually, the opposite is true. By obsessing over CO&I, we set
up the very conditions that insure ever greater unhappiness. We
stress and then overload ourselves because of the illusion of ownership.
We isolate and harden ourselves trying for independence. And we
fool ourselves into frustration by trying to control everything.
The times we live in make us so susceptible
to the three deceivers. In earlier, more agrarian times, our dependence
on God and interdependence on each other was more apparent. Big,
uncontrollable things, like the weather, were more apparent to us
and affected us more. And there were not nearly as many "things"
in our lives that we could think that we owned.
Today, with our sophistication and
our isolation from nature, and within our cocoon of technology and
artificial environments, it becomes easier to think that we independently
own and control things. The very artificiality of our world enhances
the deception and multiplies our unhappiness.
"Wrong" as in False
A couple of columns ago, we discussed
that wrong could be defined as morally wrong (bad) or as factually
wrong (false). To one who believes in Heavenly Father's plan of
happiness and in the Restoration, CO&I are simply and eternally
false concepts. We own nothing (except perhaps our agency). We control
nothing (except perhaps, someday, ourselves). And we are independent
of nothing in an eternal life where we all affect each other.
It is important to see "things
as they really are" if we are to become the true children of
God who perceive both the possibility and the difficulty of returning
to Him. The great gift of the restoration is the insights it gives
to who we really are, and what our relationship to each other and
to God really are. These divine insights tell us (and make us so
thankful that we know) that we are anything but independent, anything
but in control, and anything but owners. God is those things. We
are His children. This is His plan. Because of it and because of
His Son, the great implementer, we can return.
Thus we celebrate the great truth of
His Control, His Independence, and His Ownership of all. From that
perspective, we begin to see what and who we are and begin to see
why loving Him and returning to Him is the goal.
Wrong because they Separate
us from God
It has been said that the best definitions
of "right" and "wrong" is that Right brings
us closer to God and Wrong further separates us from God. When you
think you own something, it separates you a bit more from He who
owns all. When you think you control something, it separates you
a bit more from He who controls all. And when you think you are
independent, it separates you a little from He on whom you depend.
Humility is a quality that draws us closer to Him, and the illusion
of CO&I is destructive to humility and constructive to pride.
What we are all looking for, in the
Three Alternatives, is insight — new and better ways to look
at the world, at other people, and at ourselves. Since this column
started 10 weeks ago, I have received hundreds of thoughtful emails
from Meridian readers outlining what they think the Three Alternatives
are. I have learned from these letters. I have adjusted my own thinking
in many ways because of their ideas and thoughts. I have learned
that the Gospel leads us all in the same directions and unites us
in our feelings and in what "rings true."
Next column will be devoted to a sample
selection of some of your letters, your guesses, proposals, and
ideas for what to call the Three Alternatives (and how to define
them). To those of you who have ideas you have not yet sent in,
email me by Monday so I can include your inputs and insights.
To take a guess on what
The Three Alternatives are, or to express your ideas or feedback,
write to Richard@meridianmagazine.com
As you make your own search for the Three Alternative, or as
you send them in to me, remember that they must preserve all of
the good aspects of CO&I (initiative, discipline, responsibility
and so on) but eliminate all of the negative aspects (judgment,
jealousy, conceit, presumption, envy, covetousness, and other deceiving
and damaging qualities). The Three Alternatives must draw us closer
to God rather than distancing us from Him.
Click
here to sign up for Meridian's FREE email updates.
© 2007 Meridian
Magazine. All Rights Reserved.
|